Book a Call
Programs
Research Allowance ZIM GRW WIPANO BAFA EEW KMU-innovativ KfW Innovationskredite EXIST Eurostars 3 EIC Accelerator Horizon Europe EU Innovation Fund Compare all programs
Who we fund
AIHealthcareSustainabilityRoboticsManufacturingSolarBiotechAgricultureEVAll industries
Case Studies
Browse case studies Research Allowance ZIM GRW WIPANO BAFA EEW KMU-innovativ KfW Innovationskredite EXIST Eurostars 3 EIC Accelerator Horizon Europe EU Innovation Fund
Resources
Guides Blog
About Us
FinTech · Case study

FinTech allowance: tokenisation as an R&D case.

A fintech funded the technical development of tokenised securities by delineating the technology from the business model, on an eligible base around €0.75 million.

€260,000
research allowance granted
€750,000
eligible base
Up to 35%
SME funding rate
Free assessment Read the story
At a glance

The mandate in figures

IndustryFinTech / tokenisationTokenised securities
Research allowance granted€260,000Fully claimable, paid as cash
Eligible base€750,000
ScenarioCertified; part not recognised
Projects1
SME funding rateUp to 35%
About the company

The company, and the R&D underneath

The company develops technical infrastructure to represent real-asset investments as tokenized securities and make them tradable. The eligible core is not the business model but the technology behind it: the decentralized, tamper-proof issuance and settlement of security tokens with all the technical requirements for integrity, traceability and reliability.

A part of the development was contracted out. So the question arose of which share of this contract research is actually eligible.

The challenge

Where the funding really sat

FinTech applications have a particular trap: mixing business model and technology. Eligible is not the financial innovation as such, not the legal structuring and not the marketing, but solely the technical development work with scientific-technical uncertainty. This line must be drawn clearly.

On top came the contract research. Not every external service solves an independent technical problem, some is implementation to specification. A blanket treatment would have weakened the application.

Novelty Technical risk / uncertainty Systematic approach
Our approach

How we built the case

We consistently focused the application on the technical core: the decentralized issuance and settlement of tokenized securities with the associated technical uncertainties. Business model, legal structuring and distribution stayed out, they are not eligible and would only have offered attack surface.

We treated the contract research in a differentiated way: where external partners solved an independent technical problem, we presented the work as eligible; where it was more about implementation to specification, we classified it openly as such. In the decision, as expected under a differentiated view, part of the contract research was not recognized, while the viable part and the in-house work were.

How the case moved

↻
Focused
Technology, not business model
↻
Split
Contract research differentiated
✓
Certified
Core granted, part not

What made up the eligible base

In-house ~75%Contract ~20%
In-house personnel workContract research (recognised)Not recognised

Eligible base around €0.75 million, predominantly in-house work; part of the contract research was not recognised. Split shown is illustrative.

The result

A €260,000 research allowance.

The eligible base is in the order of magnitude of around EUR 0.75 million, predominantly from in-house work. At an SME rate of up to 35%, this yields a research allowance in the low to mid six-figure range. The partial non-recognition of the contract research did not damage the core of the funding, because it was cleanly separated from the start.

Eligible base €750,000 · SME rate Up to 35%
Certified; part not recognisedThe outcome of the mandate.
Eligible base €750,000Recognised cost the allowance is calculated on.
SME rate Up to 35%Applied to the eligible base.
Key takeaways

What other companies can learn

FinTech is eligible, but only at the right place. Three points are decisive:

01

Separate technology from business model

Eligible is the technical development with an open outcome, not the financial innovation, the legal structure or distribution. This separation belongs at the core of the application.

02

Treat contract research in a differentiated way

An honest split into viable and weaker engagements protects overall credibility and thus the recognized part.

03

Expect partial cuts

That not every external service is recognized is normal. What matters is that the core, usually the in-house work, stays stable.

“
FinTech sits at the intersection of law, finance and technology, and exactly there the delineation of eligible research matters most.
BeFunded On the research allowance
FAQ

Your questions, answered

The most common questions on this kind of case. Short answer first, detail after.

Yes, insofar as the technical development goes beyond the state of the art and carries a scientific-technical uncertainty. Business model, legal structuring and distribution are not eligible.

The technical development work on it can be eligible if it concerns a new or substantially improved process with an open outcome. The pure financial innovation as such is not.

The eligible base is reduced by that share. The recognized part and the in-house work stay funded. A differentiated presentation minimizes the risk.

Eligible is only what solves a technical problem with an open outcome. Anything pursuing economic, legal or distribution goals does not belong in the application.

Keep reading

More case studies

Free eligibility check

See if your R&D qualifies for the Research Allowance

Tell us about your project. One of our funding advisors reviews your case by hand, then either comes back with feedback or a few follow-up questions. No obligation.

  • Whether your R&D qualifies for the allowance
  • A first read on the amount you could reclaim
  • What to prepare, including for 2022 and 2023

We reply within one working day. Your details go straight to our funding team.