Back to guides EU Innovation Fund

EU Innovation Fund: scaling clean tech.

Funded by EU emissions-trading revenues, the Innovation Fund backs first-of-a-kind net-zero projects, from energy-intensive industry to renewables, storage and hydrogen.

Last updated: 24 October 2026 · Help with your application: EU Innovation Fund consulting

In short

Covers up to 60% of the relevant costs, not the total project cost.
Large-, medium- and small-scale tracks plus hydrogen and industrial-heat auctions.
Scored as a cascade, starting at the degree of innovation.

What is the EU Innovation Fund?

The EU Innovation Fund is financed by revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System and backs innovative low-carbon technologies at the point of deployment — one of the world’s largest clean-tech funds.

The project tracks

Your route depends on project size and technology.

Large-scale projects (capex above €100m)
Medium-scale (capex €20m to €100m) and small-scale projects (€2.5m to €20m)
Hydrogen and industrial-heat auctions (fixed premium per unit)

What it backs

Innovative, low-carbon technology beyond the state of the art, in covered sectors: energy-intensive industry, renewables, storage, CCUS, hydrogen, clean-tech manufacturing, maritime and transport — located in the EU/EEA.

How much is funded

Up to 60% of the “relevant costs”: by default the project’s capex plus the present value of opex and maintenance capex over the first ten years of operation, minus revenues and operational benefits.

How proposals are scored

Projects are scored on the degree of innovation, greenhouse-gas emission avoidance, maturity, replicability and cost-efficiency, and the scoring runs as a cascade. We build the GHG and cost case the CINEA evaluators demand.

Relevant costs, the concept that defines the grant

This is the most misunderstood part of the Fund, and getting it right is the difference between a credible ask and a rejected one.

The grant is not calculated on the total project cost. It is calculated on the relevant costs. Since November 2024 the default method needs no reference plant: broadly, relevant costs = CAPEX + present value of OPEX and maintenance CAPEX − present value of revenues and operational benefits, over construction and the first ten years of operation, discounted with the project's WACC. Comparing against a conventional reference plant with the same output is now only a fall-back, allowed when you can document such a plant in full and excluded when you modify an existing plant. The grant is then up to 60% of those relevant costs, paid as a lump sum. For most projects there is no fixed maximum (large industrial grants reach the hundreds of millions); pilots are capped at €40M. If relevant costs fall, the grant is reduced so it never exceeds 60%. Whatever the grant does not cover must be co-financed.

Grants versus auctions

The Fund delivers support through two instruments; picking the right one is the first strategic decision.

The grant call, Net-Zero Technologies (NZT), is the main route, funding innovative decarbonisation across all eligible sectors at up to 60% of relevant costs. The general topics are split by project size, Large-, Medium- and Small-Scale Projects (the small-scale route is a strong fit for SMEs and pilot lines), plus dedicated topics for Clean-Tech Manufacturing (factories for electrolysers, batteries, PV, heat pumps and fuel-cell parts, CAPEX above €2.5M) and first-of-a-kind Pilots (grant capped at €40M).

The auctions are a market-based route that pays a fixed premium per unit, pay-as-bid, instead of a grant on costs. The Hydrogen auction (AUC-H2), the European Hydrogen Bank mechanism, pays a premium per kilogram of renewable hydrogen for up to 10 years. The Industrial Heat auction (AUC-HEAT) pays a premium per MWh of low-carbon process heat replacing fossil heat, for up to 5 years; bids are ranked by €/t of CO₂ avoided. The rule of thumb: hydrogen → AUC-H2, industrial heat → AUC-HEAT, all other decarbonisation → the NZT grant. Promising-but-immature projects can use EIB Project Development Assistance to get ready for a future call.

How it's evaluated

Independent experts score proposals on award criteria built around innovation and climate impact.

The criteria are the degree of innovation (genuinely beyond the state of the art), GHG emission avoidance (the scale, robustness and verifiability of the reductions, calculated with the official methodology), project maturity (technical, financial and operational readiness to reach financial close and operation), replicability and scalability, and cost efficiency (relevant cost and public support requested per unit of GHG avoided). Scoring runs as a cascade that starts at the degree of innovation, each criterion carries its own pass mark, proposals are then ranked, and projects are funded in order until the budget is exhausted, so a fundable project can still miss out on budget. For auctions, selection is pay-as-bid: the lowest-premium bids win until the budget runs out. The 2025 NZT call also awards up to three bonus points: for net carbon removal, for projects coordinated and implemented solely by SMEs, and for maritime projects. The most common reasons strong-sounding projects fail are weak or poorly quantified GHG impact, insufficient maturity, or a poor ratio of avoidance to support requested.

Industry examples

Sector-broad but climate-focused. These are illustrative project shapes, not named beneficiaries.

Energy-intensive industry, innovative low-carbon steel, cement, chemicals, refineries, glass or paper (hydrogen-based or electrified).
Carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS), capturing industrial CO₂ for permanent storage or use.
Renewable energy and energy storage, novel or integrated generation and flexibility solutions.
Hydrogen, renewable and low-carbon production (often via AUC-H2) and its use in hard-to-abate sectors.
Industrial heat, electrified or renewable process heat (often via AUC-HEAT).
Clean-tech manufacturing, factories for electrolysers, batteries, PV, heat pumps and fuel-cell components.

The common thread is the Innovation Fund logic: an innovative, commercial-scale project delivering large, verifiable GHG reductions, mature enough to be built, and replicable. Early-stage research, incremental or low-impact projects point to Horizon Europe or the EIC for R&D, or to a national programme.

Common mistakes

The errors that most often sink an Innovation Fund application.

Treating it as a research grant, the Fund funds deployment, not R&D; the call sets no fixed TRL range.
Claiming total project cost, the grant covers only the relevant costs: capex plus ten years of operating costs, net of revenues.
Weak or poorly quantified GHG impact, it must be substantial and use the official methodology.
An immature project, maturity is weighed like project finance.
Forgetting there is no pre-financing, up to 40% of the grant covers the periods to financial close and at least 60% comes after it, of which at least 10% only after entry into operation.
Choosing the wrong route, hydrogen → AUC-H2, heat → AUC-HEAT, other → NZT grant.
Wrong location, the project must sit in the EU, Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, though the applicant can be anywhere.
Assuming the budget guarantees funding, selection is ranked and budget-limited.

The timeline, end to end

The binding dates are the call deadlines on the Funding & Tenders Portal; the Fund runs annual calls.

Assess fit and maturity (months), confirm deployment (TRL ~6-9), eligible sector and location, GHG impact and maturity, and choose a grant category or auction.
Prepare the application (about four to five months), build the technical, financial and business case and calculate relevant costs and GHG avoidance with the official methodologies.
Submit by the deadline, via the Funding & Tenders Portal (the NZT grant and the auctions have different deadlines).
Evaluation and ranking (months), independent experts score the criteria, projects are ranked, and the budget determines awards.
Grant preparation or award, finalise relevant costs, milestones and GHG monitoring (or, for auctions, the premium contract).
Financial close and construction, the project reaches financial close and is built; up to 40% of the grant covers the periods up to financial close, at least 60% follows after it.
Operation, monitoring and payment (within a 3 to 15-year horizon), the plant operates and GHG avoidance is verified; at least 10% of the grant, part of that 60%, is paid after entry into operation. Auctions instead pay their premium per unit delivered.

Preparation is substantial, the competition is intense, and there is no entitlement. Always check the Funding & Tenders Portal for the current or next call before applying.

How to apply

Applications run through the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, where each call's documentation lives.

The route is to confirm fit and choose the route (an NZT grant category, Large, Medium or Small-Scale, Clean-Tech Manufacturing or Pilot, or a hydrogen or industrial-heat auction; with EIB Project Development Assistance if the project is not yet mature); build the case and the calculations, with the relevant-cost and GHG-avoidance methodologies at its heart (CINEA provides templates and tutorials); submit by the deadline (the NZT call is a single full submission, and the auction deadline differs); face evaluation and ranking by independent experts, with auctions ranked pay-as-bid; enter the grant agreement or award; then build, operate, report and get paid, with up to 40% disbursed up to financial close and at least 60% after it, of which at least 10% only after entry into operation.

What to prepare

The application is built around the project's technical, financial and climate case; two calculations are decisive.

For an NZT grant: the Part A administrative and Part B technical forms on the portal; a technical description (the innovation beyond the state of the art, the technology, the scale and the TRL ~6-9 maturity); the GHG emission-avoidance calculation using the official methodology; the relevant-cost calculation (by default CAPEX plus ten years of OPEX and maintenance CAPEX, net of revenues; a reference plant only where you can document one); the business plan and financial structure evidencing a path to financial close and operation; and a project implementation plan with milestones. For auctions, the bid (the requested premium per unit) plus the technical, financial and eligibility documentation set in the auction terms. Legal-entity registration and any required permits complete the set, and the exact templates live on the Funding & Tenders Portal per call.